Mapol.ca


SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT
Mandatory Generic Substitution For 
Immunosuppressant Transplant Drugs
Is it the safest and healthiest policy for patients?
The potential for uncontrolled generic switching of immunosuppressant transplant 
drugs, such as tacrolimus or cyclosporine, due to mandatory generic substitution 
plans, can negatively impact patient (plan member) safety and health outcomes, 
resulting in higher costs. Does your drug benefit plan have proper safeguards to 
avoid this scenario?
Are mandatory generic substitution plans the best 
switching from brand to generic drug, or between 
solution for all drugs?
different generic formulations, may result in less 
Mandatory generic substitution plans assume all brand 
optimal treatment. Plan sponsors must balance the 
drugs and their corresponding generics are equivalent 
need for cost containment while having plan mem-
and will have similar clinical outcomes and adverse 
bers receive appropriate treatment by ensuring 
effects for patients. Generic equivalencies are based 
processes are in place for plan design exceptions. 
on Health Canada bioequivalence standards as wel as 
provincial legislation, regulations, and/or policies. 
In a mandatory generic substitution plan, plan 
sponsors will reimburse pharmacies and plan mem-
bers only the price of the lowest generic equiva-
lent of the brand drug. Pharmacists can substitute 
interchangeable generics at the pharmacy without 
consultation or approval by the physician. Pharmacy 
purchasing practices can also influence which drug a 
patient receives, as generic suppliers can change based 
on cost and availability. This is important as Health 
Brand vs. Generic
Canada requires a generic manufacturer to prove that 
its drug is bioequivalent to the brand or reference 
drug, but does not have to show bio-equivalence to 
other generic versions. 
Generic substitution plans, in general, achieve their 
goal of providing similar clinical outcomes at a lower 
cost to the plan sponsor and member. These prac-
tices have been a mainstay for both public and private 
Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters
drug benefit plans over the last few decades. How-
� Area under the curve (AUC)→ marker of drug exposure
ever, in a number of circumstances, the uncontrolled 
� Peak drug concentration achieved following dosing (Cmax)

What exceptions should be considered?
Desired Outcomes for Immunosuppressant
There are a number of immunosuppressant transplant 
Therapy in Transplantation
drugs that should be considered as exceptions in manda-
tory generic substitution plans. These drugs have been des-
ignated as ‘Critical Dose Drugs' (CDDs) by Health Canada. 
In 2012, Health Canada published an update to its ‘Guidance 
Document – Comparative Bioavailability Standards: For-
mulations Used for Systemic Effects,' which defines bio-
Minimize hypertension, 
Prevent rejection, prolong 
equivalence standards and exceptions. One important 
kidney damage, GI effects, 
life of graft & patient
exception involves CDDs, which are defined as ‘drugs 
diabetes, infection, cancer.
where small differences in dose and blood levels may lead 
to serious therapeutic failures and/or serious adverse reac-
tions which may be life-threatening, or result in hospi-
talization, persistent disability or incapacity, or death.' A 
CDD has a narrow therapeutic range where blood levels, 
clinical response and toxicity are closely linked. Health Canada 
has designated several drugs within this category, includ-
Between Efficacy and Toxicity
ing the immunosuppressant transplant drugs: cyclosporine 
(Neoral®), sirolimus (Rapamune®), and tacrolimus (Prograf®). 
In the ‘Guidance Document,' Health Canada has not 
established guidelines or standards for generic substitution 
What are the unique patient considerations for 
of CDDs. However, a number of European regulatory bod-
ies have created exceptions for tacrolimus. For example, in 
With the advent of newer drug therapies, one-year kidney 
Spain and the United Kingdom, oral generic formulations 
graft survival rates have improved, from 65% in 1975 to 
of tacrolimus are branded by name. Prescribing and dis-
over 97% in 2009 (Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 
pensing should be done by brand name only to minimize 
2011, CIHI). Success in transplantation relies on manag-
the risk of inadvertent switching between products, which 
ing the body's immune response to optimize graft survival. 
has been associated with reports of toxicity.1-4 In Denmark, 
The usual approach is ‘triple therapy' for long-term main-
generic substitution of oral tacrolimus is not allowed.5 
tenance, including one of the following CDDs: Prograf® 
Norway now recommends that tacrolimus should not be 
(tacrolimus immediate release capsules), Advagraf® (tacro-
substitutable at pharmacies. The Italian Medicines Agency 
limus extended release capsules) or Neoral® (cyclosporine 
issued a statement ‘that oral tacrolimus may not be inter-
capsules and solution). The goal for optimizing therapy in 
changed without careful therapeutic monitoring under 
these patients is to find the appropriate balance between 
the strict supervision of a transplant specialist, and the 
drug efficacy and toxicity while preventing graft rejection. 
chemist should always dispense the commercial name as 
"The appropriate management of immunosuppressive 
prescribed by the physician'.6 
drug therapy is critical to success in transplantation. The level 
There are also a number of Canadian examples for excep-
of the drug in blood is used as a surrogate marker to gauge 
tion approval processes of critical dose immunosuppressant 
an individual patient's level of immunosuppression. Drugs 
transplant drugs, two of which are in Ontario and Quebec.
like Prograf® (tacrolimus) require close blood level monitor-
In Ontario, the Special Drugs Program (SDP) covers the 
ing to ensure that the level of drug in the blood remains in 
full cost of certain outpatient drugs used to treat a number 
the desired target range. As the therapeutic range is narrow, 
of serious conditions. Included in the program is Neoral® 
changes in exposure may compromise patient outcomes," 
(cyclosporine) for treatment in solid organ or bone marrow 
says Jennifer Harrison, Pharmacy Clinical Site Leader with 
transplant if prescribed by a physician on the medical staff 
the University Health Network in Toronto.  
of a Group O hospital, under the Public Hospitals Act.7
Acute kidney graft rejection may be a consequence of inap-
In Quebec, Liste de médicaments published by the Régie 
propriate dosing, which may result in hospitalization, more 
de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) includes cyclo-
intensive intravenous immunosuppressive therapy, infec-
sporine as a narrow therapeutic index drug (Schedule VII). 
tion, possible shortening of graft life or actual loss of graft 
Cyclosporine is therefore exempt from the province's low-
function. The patient may also experience other complica-
est cost available policy and Neoral® is reimbursed when 
tions or adverse effects from intensified therapy. Unintended 
prescribed by a physician.8
consequences for a plan sponsor may include an increase in 
Canada's provincial drug plan and private drug benefit 
disability costs and absenteeism for its plan member.
managers can utilize these experiences for other critical 
dose immunosuppressant transplant drugs when generics 
What are the recommendations of healthcare 
become available. The importance is paramount because 
professionals for the prescribing and dispensing of 
as of this writing it is expected Health Canada will approve 
critical dose drugs?
generic oral tacrolimus in the near future without such 
In light of the potential problems with generic substitution 
exceptions in place.
of CDDs, in particular in relation to unsupervised switches 
in immunosuppressive transplant therapy, healthcare pro-
fessionals through advisory meetings, consensus confer-
In a number of circumstances, the 
ences and surveys in the U.S., Europe, and Canada, have 
uncontrolled switching from brand to 
made the following recommendations:9-11
generic drug, or between different generic 
1. Generic immunosuppressant use should be approached 
formulations, may result in less optimal 
with caution.
treatment. Plan sponsors must balance the 
2. If a generic is used, it should be prescribed from the day 
of transplantation rather than switching when there is 
need for cost containment while having plan 
high risk of graft rejection. 
members receive appropriate treatment 
3. Formulation switches should be initiated only by phy-
by ensuring processes are in place for plan 
sicians; repetitive switches (between generic drugs or 
design exceptions.
between generics and the brand drug) should be avoided. 
4. Patient education is essential. Patients should be infor-
med when switches occur.
clinical monitoring is required with any dose or product 
5. Following any formulation switch, blood level monitoring 
change, whether a switch from a brand to a generic drug, or 
should occur until stable immunosuppression is established.
from one generic drug product to another. In the setting of 
6. More extensive data should be made available regarding 
mandatory generic substitution, where drug product selec-
the efficacy and safety of generic immunosuppressive 
tion is defined by the insurer and dispensed at the retail 
therapy for proper use and monitoring.
pharmacy, the prescriber may not be informed of drug 
product switches. Without timely prescriber notification, 
Harrison further states that, "There is widespread con-
the requisite monitoring cannot be performed, which poses 
sensus in the transplant community that blood level and 
a significant patient safety concern."
The Case: Substituting Critical Dose Immunosuppressant Transplant Drug Generic A for Brand
On leaving hospital, patient receives a 
After two months, patient's pharmacist 
two-month supply of branded medications
dispenses Generic A in place of his 
does not mean 
ation 100%
Blood level profile of patient's 
Generic A is bioequivalent to patient's
branded medication
branded medication
The Case: Substituting Critical Dose Immunosuppressant Transplant Drug Generic A and Generic B
(Generics may not be bioequivalent with each other)
After six months, patient's pharmacist
Patient may be switching between drugs
dispenses Generic B in place of Generic A
that are not bioequivalent with each other
May have variability
in blood levels between 
ation 100%
ation 100%
= generics. Variability 
with critical dose immu-
plant drugs is associated 
with poor outcomes
Generics A and B are both
Generic B may not necessarily be 
bioequivalent to patient's branded medication
bioequivalent to Generic A
"There is widespread consensus in the transplant community that blood level and 
clinical monitoring is required with any dose or product change, whether a switch from 
a brand to a generic drug, or from one generic drug product to another. In the setting of 
mandatory generic substitution where drug product selection is defined by the insurer 
and dispensed at the retail pharmacy, the prescriber may not be informed of drug product 
switches…"—Jennifer Harrison, University Health Network
been approved as safe for use by Health Canada, uncon-
trolled substitution for these drugs may be unsafe. 
Below are some suggestions for managing CDD immu-
nosuppressant transplant therapy for plan sponsors, plan 
members, and healthcare professionals:
1. Drug substitution exception policies should be imple-
mented for these drugs in certain circumstances, such 
as switching after a patient is stabilized.
a. Establish standardized proactive exception pro-
cesses at the drug plan design level for these drugs 
(prior to prescribing by a physician).
2. Formulation switches should be initiated only by physi-
cians experienced in transplantation; repetitive switches 
(between generic brands) should be avoided.
a. Following any formulation switch, blood level 
What are the new management challenges and 
monitoring MUST occur until stable immuno- 
action plans for integrating generic transplant drugs 
suppression is established.
into Canadian drug benefit plans?
3. Pharmacists must inform patients and physicians if 
With the anticipated Health Canada approval of generic oral 
switches occur.
tacrolimus, and with the knowledge that additional critical 
4. Create proactive mechanisms to ensure that blood levels 
dose drugs used in immunosuppressive transplant therapy 
will likely have generic versions available in future years, 
it is imperative that guidelines, standards and policies are 
Due to the complexity and immediacy of the current sit-
established (public and private) for these drugs to balance 
uation with possible uncontrolled mandatory substitution 
cost, clinical response, and positive patient outcomes. 
of generic critical dose drugs in transplant therapy, plan 
The challenges appear to be complex and do not fit into the 
sponsors should proceed with proactive plan design excep-
standard practice of mandatory generic substitution plans, 
tion and monitoring changes to ensure appropriate ther-
where exception processes for using critical dose drugs 
apy and safety for their plan members. 
are primarily reactive (i.e., at the pharmacy), thus poten-
Steven Semelman, B.Sc.Pharm., Pharm.D., is currently 
tially delaying therapy. There needs to be an understand-
Executive Director at Mapol Inc. Dr. Semelman has over 25 
ing from all stakeholders that while generic formulations of 
years' experience in the public and private healthcare sectors 
critical dose immunosuppressant transplant drugs have 
holding both clinical and executive positions.
REFERENCES1 Nota Informativa. Ministerio de Sanidad y politica Social. Tacrolimus. Apr 4, 2009.
2 British National Formulary. Immunosuppressant therapy. http://www.bnf.org.uk. Sep 15, 2008.
3 Commission on Human Medicines Press Release. Recommendations for prescribing and dispensing of all tacrolimus products. May 24, 2012.
4 Commission on Human Medicines Letter to Health Professionals on oral tacrolimus. May 23, 2012.
5 Danish Health and Medical Authority. Licensing of medicines notification on termination of generic substitution for oral medicines containing cyclosporine and tacrolimus. 
6 Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Memorandum on measures designed to reduce the risk of therapeutic errors during treatment with oral formulations of tacrolimus. 
7 Ontario Health Insurance Act. R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 552. Consolidated Jul 2013. Section 8(2). http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_900552_e.htm#BK5 
8 Liste de medicaments-La Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ). Schedule VII. Ed 43. Jun 2013. 
9 Uber et al., Generic Drug Immunosuppression in Thoracic Transplantation: An ISHLT Educational Advisory. Consensus Statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:655-60.
10 European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Advisory Committee on Generic Substitution of Immunosuppressive Drugs. Mar 15, 2011.
11 Harrison et al. Generic Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Canadian Perspective. Transplantation. 2012; 93(7):657-665.
THIS SUPPLEMENT IS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF ASTELLAS PHARMA CANADA, INC
Source: http://mapol.ca/index.php/latest-news/item/download/176_24af8f077f21c4e016bc40eb12778589
   PD Dr med WP Bieger   NeuroStress Guide   EINLEITUNG Der vorliegende NeuroScience-Guide ist als Anleitung für Patienten, Ärzte und Therapeuten gedacht. Er soll einen Einblick in die Funktionsweise des Neuroendokriniums und in die Grundlagen neuroendokriner Funktionsstörungen und deren Behandlung vermitteln. Die von uns entwickelte „NeuroStress"-Diagnostik wird vorgestellt und physiologische Behandlungsformen besprochen. Schon lange gibt es hochwirksame Substanzen für die natürliche Behandlung psychoneurovegetativer Störungen, die allerdings durch die Entwicklung der modernen Psychopharmaka verdrängt wurden. Die unbefriedigenden Ergebnisse der Antidepressiva haben die traditionellen Behandlungskonzepte jedoch wieder ins Bewusstsein gerückt. Unser aktuelles ganzheitliches diagnostisch-therapeutisches Konzept greift die bewährten Verfahren auf und verbindet sie mit innovativen Diagnose- und Behandlungsformen aus den USA. Eingangsüberlegungen: 1. Die Zahl neurovegetativer Störungen und psychischer Krankheiten nimmt weltweit stark zu. Damit auch die Nachfrage nach neuen diagnostischen Möglichkeiten und effzienten, gut verträglichen Behandlungen. Seit Jahren steigt die Zahl psychischer Störungen in den westlichen Industrieländern. Man geht davon aus, dass bis zu 60% der Krankheitsfälle in der täglichen ärztlichen Praxis psychischer Natur sind bzw. eng mit psychischen Belastungen verbunden sind. Schon heute entfallen viele Krankheitstage auf psychische Störungen, ihre Zahl nimmt ständig zu, während die Gesamtzahl krankheitsbedingter Fehltage seit Jahren zurückgeht. Besonders gravierend ist die Zunahme der Depressionen. Während Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen, Herzinfarkt, sogar die häufigsten Krebserkrankungen (Lungen-, Brust- und Prostatakrebs) seit einigen Jahren abnehmende Tendenz zeigen, nimmt der Anteil von Depressionen ständig zu. Die WHO geht in einem ihrer jüngsten Gesundheitsberichte (2006) davon aus, dass bereits in den nächsten 5-10 Jahren Depressionen die zweithäufigste medizinische Krankheitsursache überhaupt sein werden. 2. Psychopharmaka werden heute in enormem Maße eingesetzt, sie sind mit >65 Mrd € die umsatzstärkste pharmazeutische Präparategruppe. Ihre Wirksamkeit, vor allem die der Antidepressiva, ist jedoch begrenzt. Die Nebenwirkungen sind zahlreich und zum Teil lebensbedrohlich. Immer wieder werden Zweifel am Aussagewert von Psychopharmakastudien geäußert, die Publikation von klinischen Studien mit Antidepressiva erfolgt offensichtlich nach willkürlichen Kriterien (NEJM, 2008). In einer kürzlichen Metaanalyse wurde die fehende Wirksamkeit von Antidepressiva bei leichten bis mittelschweren Depressionen konstatiert (PloS Medicine, 2008). Nur bei schweren Depressionen findet sich ein Vorteil von Antidepressiva gegenüber Placebos. 3. Die Neurobiologie psychischer Störungen wird seit Jahren intensiv untersucht, neue Untersuchungsverfahren wie MRT, PET, SPECT, Immunologie oder Molekulargenetik haben das Verständnis der zentralen Prozesse enorm verbessert. Neue Diagnose- und Behandlungsverfahren können daher stärker auf Wissen und weniger auf Zufallsbeobachtungen wie bisher basiert werden.  STRESS Als eines der zentralen Geschehen gilt chronischer Stress, der vielfach zu bleibenden psychovegetativen Störungen führt. Ein kürzlich erschienenes Buch des Bonner Psychiaters Prof. Benkert (2006) hat den Begriff der „StressDepression" geprägt und damit „Stress" als ganz wesentlichen Grund für psychische Störungen einschließlich Depressionen in den Mittelpunkt 
  
   Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Aerosolized  Albuterol Versus Placebo in Acute Lung Injury  ARDS Clinical Network  ARDSNet Study 06 – Version II  October 31, 2007  Michael A. Matthay MD, Protocol Committee Chair  Roy Brower, MD, Protocol Committee Co-Chair  ALTA VersionII  Page 1 of 75  ARDSNet Study 06 October 31, 2007