Avian flu: preparing for a pandemic
Volume V, Issue 1January 2006
A report for clients and colleagues of Marsh on risk-related topics
Avian Flu: Preparing for a Pandemic
With contributions from Kroll and Mercer Management Consulting
A Brief History of Flu Pandemics
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
The Emergence of H5N1—Avian Flu. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Corporate Preparedness and Business Continuity
. . . . . . 8
Immense Challenges for the Health Care System
. . . . . . 14
Insurance Coverage Questions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Abbreviations and Acronyms in This Issue
. . . . . . . . . 26
Marsh publishes Risk Alert
to keep its clients and colleagues informed on criticalissues related to risk. For additional copies, please contact [email protected]
This report is also available for download at http://www.marsh.com.
Author: Tom Walsh
Editor: Meike Olin, CPCU, CIC
Production Manager: Christine Reilly
Publisher: Timothy J. Mahoney
With increasing urgency over the past year, a variety of govern-ments, nongovernmental organizations, industry groups, andmedia outlets have trumpeted the potential dangers of avianinfluenza, commonly called "bird flu." Of the 139 people known to have been infected with avian flu as of the publication date,
‘It is only a matter of
71 have died—a fearsome mortality rate. Suddenly, the word
time before an avian
"pandemic" is on the tongues of world leaders, references to the
flu virus—most likely
catastrophic 1918 Spanish Flu are common, and many businessesare nervously looking for gaps in their business-continuity plans.
Human deaths from the bird flu have been reported in five coun-
ability to be transmitted
tries. Thus far, the spread of the virus to humans has largely been
from human to human,
accomplished through contact with infected birds, although a
sparking the outbreak
few possible cases of human-to-human transmission are beinginvestigated. These cases involved families where prolonged daily
of human pandemic
contact and exposure existed. The possibility that the virus will
influenza. We don't know
mutate to allow sustained human-to-human transmission hashealth authorities on high alert.
when this will happen.
"It is only a matter of time before an avian flu virus—most likely
But we do know that it
H5N1—acquires the ability to be transmitted from human to
human, sparking the outbreak of human pandemic influenza.
We don't know when this will happen. But we do know that it
—Lee Jong-wook, director-general
will happen," Lee Jong-wook, director-general of the World Health
of the World Health Organization
Organization (WHO), said during a recent gathering of healthexperts from more than 100 countries.
Likewise, businesses would be well-advised to ensure their emergency-response and business-continuity plans are up-to-date and include specific planning for dealing with a pandemic.
This issue of Risk Alert
provide background information on avian flu and human
discuss corporate preparedness and business-continuity
management (BCM) through the lens of a pandemic;
highlight the international implications of a pandemic; and
outline some of the potential insurance coverage issues related
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 1
A Brief History of Flu Pandemics
Business Questions About
A pandemic occurs when a new strain of the influenza A virus
strikes humans, spreads easily from person to person, and causes
Here are some questions risk
serious illness with a high death rate. Since at least the 16th cen-
managers should consider asking
tury, flu pandemics have swept the globe an average of three times
themselves about a potential avian
per century, emerging every 10 to 50 years. In the 20th century,
pandemics emerged in 1918, 1957, and 1968. Nearly 40 years after
How do we anticipate risks from
the last pandemic, the appearance of an especially virulent strain
a pandemic that could harm our company?
of flu in birds in 1997 and again in 2004 raised an alarm amongworld authorities when it infected a small number of people.
How can we respond effectively
to the threat of a pandemic?
"We expect the next influenza pandemic to come at any time
What should we do if employees
now, and it's likely to be caused by a mutant [strain] of the virus
are exposed to or develop avian flu?
that is currently causing bird flu in Asia," Dr. David Nabarro, coor-
Can we keep our business operating
dinator of avian flu response efforts for the United Nations, said
if employees or a critical employeeis infected?
in September 2005.
How can we manage pandemic-
No one can predict with accuracy the extent of damage the
related disruptions in our supplychains?
next flu pandemic will cause. Projections of deaths, illness, andeconomic damage are generally built by extrapolating from past
How should we communicate to
our customers, employees, and
pandemics. Following is a brief look at the characteristics of the
suppliers the steps we are taking
three pandemics of the 20th century.
to deal with avian flu?
Will property and/or casualty policies
Influenza Pandemic Comparisons
cover pandemic-related claims?
How much will avian flu cost?
What are the potential impacts
Avian flu estimates
(if pandemic were to emerge in 2006)
: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau
Death estimates from World Health Organization and others
The Spanish Flu of 1918-1919
The first pandemic of the 20th century is widely regarded as thedeadliest disease in human history. Death estimates worldwide
range from 20 million to more than 100 million. The following aresome of the characteristics of the 1918 flu outbreak:
Outbreaks occurred simultaneously in Europe and several
states in the United States.
The pandemic broke in two waves. The first, in the spring and
summer of 1918, was highly contagious, but did not cause
One of the Spanish Flu's
many deaths. The second wave crashed across the world with
most troubling aspects
remarkable speed and lethality. The death rate was 10 timesgreater in the second wave than the first.
was that most deaths
One of the Spanish Flu's most troubling aspects was that most
occurred in people in
deaths occurred in people in "the prime of life," between 15
"the prime of life,"
and 35 years old. With most influenza strains, the majority ofdeaths occur among the very young, the very old, and people
between 15 and 35
with compromised immune systems.
The flu infected about 25 percent to 30 percent of the world's
population, striking every continent.
The Pandemic of 1957-1958
Science and medicine made immense strides between 1918 and1957. By 1957, vaccines for seasonal flu existed; antibiotics hadbeen discovered that could be used to treat flu-related pneumonia;and the WHO's Global Influenza Surveillance Network, whichmonitors and tracks the flu's spread, was 10 years old. The follow-ing are some of the characteristics of the 1957-1958 pandemic:
A milder strain of the flu virus was at the root of the pandemic,
as compared with the 1918 pandemic.
Detection of outbreaks in Hong Kong and Singapore in early
May led to the identification of the exact virus strain; so that by the end of the month, samples of the virus were available to vaccine manufacturers.
The pandemic touched all corners of the world within six
months. As was the case in 1918, the first wave of the pandemic caused fewer deaths than the second wave.
An estimated 2 million people died during the pandemic. Unlike
the situation in 1918, deaths were primarily among the elderly.
As is the case now, one of the major stumbling blocks to
producing sufficient amounts of the vaccine was the lack ofmanufacturing capacity.
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 3
The Pandemic of 1968-1969
The last pandemic of the 20th century was the least severe of the three. The following are some of the characteristics of the1968-1969 pandemic:
Symptoms were much milder, and the mortality rate was
Concern about H5N1
much lower than with the 1957 pandemic: possibly because it was a similar strain to that virus. Since only 11 years had
passed between the two pandemics, many people were alive
who had been exposed to the 1957 flu and, thus, had receivedsome level of natural protection.
in October 2005 that
The pandemic led to about 1 million deaths.
genetic detective work
had traced the 1918
The Emergence of H5N1—Avian Flu
influenza to an avian
In 1997, an outbreak of avian influenza among poultry in Hong
Kong was traced to the H5N1 virus strain (see sidebar on page 5).
The outbreak was accompanied by 18 cases of human infection;six of those people died. There was immediate apprehensionamong world health officials, as this was the first time an avianflu virus was known to have infected humans. Concern aboutH5N1 heightened after scientists reported in October 2005 thatgenetic detective work had traced the 1918 influenza to an avianflu virus. An aggressive response, in which more than 1.5 millionchickens and other fowl were destroyed, helped stem the 1997outbreak; and the threat disappeared—temporarily.
In late 2003, the H5N1 virus was identified as the culprit in thedeaths of chickens at a commercial farm in South Korea. Ridingthe wings of migratory birds, the virus has since moved fromAsia, where it is now endemic, to Eastern Europe. The H5N1 subtype is expected to appear in more countries through birdmigration. More than 150 million domestic fowl in Asia havebeen killed in an effort to stop the spread among birds—with the hope that doing so will prevent further infection of people.
China is attempting the largest animal inoculation program ever,an effort to vaccinate up to 14 billion domestic birds.
The virus has also been found in domestic pigs in China and incaptive tigers and leopards in Thailand that had been fed rawchicken carcasses. Experiments with house cats in the Netherlandshave also shown the possibility that cats could act as a host forthe virus.
Human infection with H5N1:
Thus far, most cases of avian flu
Birds, Influenza, and the
in humans appear to have resulted from contact with infected
H5N1 Virus Strain
birds—such as breathing in dust containing bird feces—from
Bird populations are a natural
contaminated surfaces, or from ingestion of uncooked or under-
reservoir for influenza A viruses. All
cooked poultry or poultry products. Investigations are under way
known subtypes of influenza A—the
in a few cases into the possibility of human-to-human infection.
most harmful to humans—are foundin birds, though most do not appear
As long as the disease lacks the ability to move easily from
to cause illness in birds.
person to person, there will be no pandemic. But the possibility
Influenza A viruses are named based
exists for a mutation to occur that will allow easy human-to-
on the two sets of proteins that
human infection and give rise to a pandemic.
extend from their outer surface likespikes on a mace.
Scientists say such a mutation could happen if, for example, a
The "H" stands for hemagglutinin,
person sick with a common seasonal flu becomes infected with
of which there are 15 subtypes,
avian flu. The two viruses could swap genetic material, creating
H1 to H15. The "N" stands for neuraminidase, of which there are
a new strain that allows easy human-to-human transmission.
nine subtypes, N1 to N9. All of the
Health officials have a number of specific worries about the
H and N subtypes have been found
H5N1 virus, including the following:
in birds; but only the H1, H2, and H3subtypes are known to have shown
Because there is little existing immunity in humans to the
the ability to transmit freely among
H5N1 strain, the spread of a mutant form could be rapid
humans over the past 100 years.
Thus, one of the red flags of thepresent avian flu virus, H5N1, is that
Some antiviral medications may not be effective. According
it is a subtype to which humans have
to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), tests
had no exposure. And since immunity
of the genetic sequence of H5N1 viruses from human cases
is built through exposure, there is no natural immunity in the human
in Vietnam and Thailand have shown resistance to two of the
population should H5N1 mutate
most commonly used antiviral medications—amantadine and
into a strain easily transmitted from
rimantadine—used to treat influenza (see sidebar on page 12).
person to person.
Developing a vaccine would take months following the
appearance of the virus.
A Global Threat
A human influenza pandemic represents the extreme end ofwhat risk managers call low-frequency/high-severity events. Aswith hurricanes, tsunamis, and earthquakes, we know the risk of apandemic exists. And as with those catastrophes, we won't knowthe severity of a pandemic until it is over. But unlike hurricanes,tsunamis, and earthquakes, a pandemic will not limit its damageto one or a few countries or a single geographic region. A pandemic's worldwide consequences could include:
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 5
more than 7 million deaths from even a mild pandemic,
United Nations Conference
according to the WHO (death estimates vary wildly—some
Develops Action Plan
top 350 million—and will ultimately depend on the virulence
International agencies and individual
of a pandemic strain);
governments have been increasingly
between 89,000 and 207,000 deaths in the United States,
sounding the alarm over avian flu. In early November 2005, the United
according to the CDC;
Nations sponsored a conference thatdrew participants from more than
25 percent or more of countries' workers needing to take
100 countries aimed at preventing or
between five and twenty days of sick leave, according to the
minimizing damage from a human
United Kingdom Department of Health;
pandemic caused by a mutation ofthe avian flu strain H5N1.
$800 billion in worldwide economic damage, according to
The conference ended with release
The World Bank; and
of a broad six-point plan focused on
major disruptions to every industry, particularly those with
the following areas:
strong ties to travel, tourism, sports and entertainment,
lodging, and health care.
veterinary services, emergency preparedness, and control measures such as culling of
The hardest hit companies in any industry are likely to be those
diseased or potentially diseased
with worldwide operations, global supply chains, and/or inter-
birds and vaccinations.
national customers. Already, some local, state, and national
: Strengthen the
governments are setting in place plans to curtail travel, close
early detection and rapid response
schools, quarantine individuals and communities, and ban
systems for animal and human flu,and enhance laboratory capacity.
public gatherings. Such steps were taken during the epidemic of SARS—Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome—in 2003, especially
: Train investi-
gators of animal and human
in Asia, where the disease was most prevalent. Such measures—
cases. Plan and test rapid-
while necessary to help slow the spread of the disease and allow
time for medical efforts to ramp up—impede commerce.
and test national pandemic
Even a relatively mild pandemic could "slow or halt economic
preparedness plans; conduct a
growth in Asia and lead to a significant reduction in trade,
global response exercise; andenhance health systems.
particularly of services," according to analysis by the AsianDevelopment Bank.
Integrated country plans
Develop national plans across allsectors as the basis for coordinated
Lessons Learned From SARS
technical and financial support.
In late 2002, SARS began to work its way around the world. By
and use factual and transparent
the time the outbreak ended in July 2003, about 800 people in
26 countries had died from the disease, just under 10 percent of
: United Nations Web site,
those believed to have been infected. The vast majority of SARS
cases were reported in Asia, although 38 people in Canada alsodied and 75 cases were reported in the United States. Concernsabout the disease led to severe travel restrictions in some countries,closure of premises by government authorities, quarantines,
and other business disruptions. The Asian Development Bankestimated the total lost business revenue at about $60 billion.
SARS was not an influenza virus, but rather a coronavirus,so named for its appearance when viewed under an electronmicroscope. SARS is a droplet infection, meaning that it spreadswhen a relatively large droplet containing the virus is coughed
For businesses with
or sneezed by an infected person and then inhaled or otherwise
ingested by another. Influenza, on the other hand, typically spreadsmore quickly; as it is an aerosol infection involving smaller
or traveling overseas,
droplets able to suspend in the air and travel greater distances.
particularly in Asia,
The SARS experience is on many people's minds as they consider
some of the "lessons
a potential avian flu pandemic. For businesses with employees
learned" from SARS
working or traveling overseas, particularly in Asia, some of the"lessons learned" from SARS could be relevant should an avian
could be relevant
flu outbreak occur. The following are some steps to bear in mind:
should an avian flu
Maintain regular communication between the home office and
other operations, with frequent and detailed updates about theunfolding situation. It's critical to give employees consistentguidance, thus avoiding confusion.
Work closely with your office building's management to get
complete and updated information on any containment, safety,or other measures implemented, and any incidents involvingother building tenants. If necessary, press them hard to revealthe true situation—they will be in direct contact with civilauthorities on these issues. Good information from the building's management will help reassure employees.
Anticipate that the anxiety among your work force may be
driven by concerns over being sent to a quarantine camp—as was done in China during the SARS epidemic—should infections be discovered in your office building.
Be ready to permit staff to work from other cities or from home.
Anticipate that companies will respond to government
instructions and refuse to accept visits or meetings. Again,this was true in China during SARS.
Maintain close contact with clients by phone. Respect any
requirements they may have limiting or eliminating physicalcontact, such as in-person meetings.
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 7
Be prepared that if you or your employees are coming from
an infected area, your own head office and firms you intend tovisit in North America may require you to spend a week ormore in a hotel before coming into the office.
Although SARS provides a recent case study to which risk managers can look for ideas in planning for avian flu, they should
An outbreak of avian
keep in mind that SARS was mild compared to the potential
flu will severely test
impact of an influenza pandemic.
even the best-laid
Corporate Preparedness and
plans, and businesses
are well-advised to
Many businesses, particularly large multinational corporations,
review and revise their
have established avian flu/pandemic planning committees.
plans in the light of
According to media reports, some are creating task forces com-
bining their strategic planning, operations-continuity procedures,human resources, and health services to adopt event-specificmeasures in anticipation of an avian flu pandemic. Others—primarily in parts of the food industry that use poultry—arepreparing marketing campaigns aimed at allaying fears about the use of their products—and thus protecting their brands—should an avian flu pandemic occur.
It's also likely that many companies are not making any specialpreparations in advance of what they see as the slim likelihoodof an avian flu pandemic; instead operating with the belief that should one occur, either it will not affect them, or they will respond as the need arises.
An outbreak of avian flu will severely test even the best-laid business-continuity plans, and businesses are well-advised toreview and revise their plans in the light of this threat. In theory,business-continuity management (BCM) should already be inplace to identify, respond to, and recover from a broad range of potential interruptions. Pandemic influenza, however, isn't a "normal" business risk. Some of a pandemic's unique character-istics include:
an international impact with no demarcation by culture,
industry, or geography;
the potential to escalate quickly and last for many months;
a projected infection rate of 25 percent or more of the world's
population, according to many public health experts;
extreme taxation of health care facilities, public health
agencies, and their work forces; and
a macro impact on regional and global economies that could
result in a significant shift in the way that companies conducttheir businesses and their ability to continue operations.
There are a number of steps companies should be taking andissues they should be considering before an outbreak, during anoutbreak, and after an outbreak. The following guidelines do not present an exhaustive picture of such preparations, but areintended to foster discussion.
If avian flu does not emerge, the time spent on planning andpreparation will not have been wasted. After all, avian flu is agood proxy for other potential pandemics; pandemics are a goodproxy for potential bioterrorism; bioterrorism is a good proxy forother forms of terrorism. Corporate preparedness is a transferableskill—even if the risk emerges from a totally different direction or source than anticipated.
Before an Outbreak
Risk managers and other executives with risk managementresponsibilities should consider the following before a pandemicbegins:
Understand the nature of the disease and the potential means
by which it could directly and indirectly affect their operations,resources, reputations, and financial fitness.
Review existing corporate-preparedness plans, procedures, and
policies, including business-continuity plans, risk managementcontrols, human-resource policies, communications capabilities,critical suppliers and vendors, and potential sales impacts. Allexisting plans should be reviewed, updated, and tested basedon the threat posed by a pandemic. For example, companiesshould ask themselves, "Will my plan work in the event of having fewer people, losing certain critical people, or havingstaff working from remote locations? Will the real or perceivedfear of an infection affect sales? How can we position the company to respond positively to this negative event?"
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 9
Regularly contact governments, international agencies, and
industry groups about the availability of guidance from whichthe company and its staff could benefit.
Companies should also ensure they know what to do and
whom to inform should they identify a suspected case of avianflu among their employees. Agree internally on what circum-
During a pandemic, the
stances relative to avian flu would trigger invocation of a BCMplan—what are the key risk indicators?
ability of an organization
Re-examine the supply chain, and assess what additional risks
to identify problems and
avian flu presents to the continuation of service from suppliers
respond quickly and
and vendors. Consider the increased risk presented from usinginternational versus regional suppliers, particularly from areas
effectively will make a
significant difference to
Review or develop employee health procedures to minimize the
the success or failure of
potential for transmission of infectious diseases to other workers.
protecting staff, profits,
Issue periodic "news releases" to employees to educate them
about the disease and what health care precautions they need
and reputation and,
to take at home and in the workplace.
ultimately, to the
Test operations-continuity plans regularly. If a company
believes that avian flu presents a significant risk, it should consider running a rehearsal using various outbreak scenariosto test the plan's effectiveness.
Try to ensure that senior managers have the skills to manage
such an event before it becomes a crisis.
During a pandemic, the ability of an organization to identifyproblems and respond quickly and effectively will make a signifi-cant difference to the success or failure of protecting staff, profits,and reputation and, ultimately, to the company's survival.
Companies should consider structuring their corporate-prepared-ness plans for a pandemic crisis into four to six escalating actionthresholds that would provide warning information in advanceand allow individual facilities, regions, and businesses to detectan emerging event and respond appropriately at each escalatedthreshold. Tiered planning should provide applicable guidancepertaining to:
allocation of company resources; health and safety issues and procedures; operations responses; human-resource/benefits involvement; internal and external communications; financial-resource allocation and impact analyses; government involvement; and product, facility, information technology (IT) and intellectual
property security controls.
Companies should review their existing preparedness plans andconsider how—and if—they will be able to answer the followingquestions during an outbreak:
Information and Communication Concerns
What is the nature of the disease? How is it transmitted,
what are its symptoms, and what health care precautions are appropriate?
Do employees know what to do and whom to contact if they
are infected or may have been exposed to the virus?
How will the company communicate with its employees if
they are not at work?
At what point do managers need to communicate to upper
management that there is a potential problem?
How will potential problems be communicated to employees
Have call centers been set up to maintain contact with
suppliers, clients, and employees?
What is the company's position if an employee wants to
What happens if an infected employee comes to work? What if a non-native employee wants to be temporarily
transferred to another region? What about his/her family?
Is or should the company be prepared to provide family death
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 11
Can the company operate with 25 percent or greater absenteeism?
Every year, millions of
Can the company have employees work remotely? What infra-
people around the world receive a
structure support is needed to support a shift to an at-home
vaccination against the flu type(s)
determined to be the most likely in acoming flu season. The vaccines work
How does the company know that supply resources are
by triggering an immune response,
bolstering the body's ability to fightoff a virus.
How will clients be assured that products are not contaminated?
There is currently no available
Will there be a disruption to the company's supply chains?
vaccine for the H5N1 influenzastrain, although efforts are under
What are the procedures to decontaminate the facility and
way in several countries, including
its heating, ventilation, air-conditioning systems, electronic
the United States, to produce one.
equipment, and soft materials (blankets, curtains, and so on)?
These efforts do not aim to yield aready-for-production vaccine because
What assurances need to be provided to the facility staff that
a vaccine must closely match the
they are safe at work?
actual strain of virus it is meant toprotect against. Large-scale produc-
At what point does the company prohibit staff from traveling
tion, therefore, cannot begin until a
to certain geographic areas?
virus mutates into a form that causesa pandemic to be declared. The trials
How will traveling employees be brought home, particularly if
currently under way are meant to lay
the groundwork that will allow forrapid development of a bird flu
Are there escalation procedures to get additional resources?
vaccine should one be needed.
Is there a trained crisis-management team that includes
Medications that help
reduce the duration and severity
on-call staff? Do the team members know what is expected of
of the flu are called antivirals. At
them? Are the correct personnel—management and others—
present, only two classes of antivirals
designated to participate on the team?
are known to show an ability to combat avian flu— adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors.
The adamantanes have not beeneffective against some of the avian
Are executives ready and capable of delivering the right messages?
viruses isolated and they also canhave side effects such as seizures.
Have press releases been prepared that can be adapted to fit
The second class of antivirals are
known as neuramindase inhibitors
Are mechanisms in place for managing internal and external
and contain the drugs oseltamivir(sold as Tamiflu) and zanamivir
(sold as Relenza). Both need to be
What if the current means of communication fail?
administered within 48 hours of theonset of symptoms to be of help;
Are there trained spokespeople for dealing with the media and
and clinical data on their use againstavian flu is, of course, limited.
(continued on page 13)
During an Escalating Pandemic
Businesses looking to ensure continued operations during thepandemic and in its immediate aftermath may find the following
(continued from page 12)
Manufacturers are working toincrease their ability to produce
Is the business-recovery team operating effectively? Does it
these drugs, particularly Tamiflu, as
have the necessary and readily available resources to support
countries are increasingly turning to stockpiling them.
its activities? Where will the team and its support resourcesstay if they have to travel or relocate to a facility?
Many medical experts advise individuals not to attempt to
Has the team initially identified and monitored changes of
stockpile antivirals, as, like any
the recovery-time objectives for each of the critical business
prescription medicine, they need tobe monitored closely and adminis-
processes that may be interrupted?
tered correctly. However, newsreports indicate that many people
Have continuity strategies been developed for each process?
and businesses have been purchasing
Have they been integrated in an effective manner or prioritized,
the drugs over the Internet. This has
particularly if multiple facilities and regions are affected?
created the additional problem ofscam artists selling what turn out
Have supply-chain dependencies been identified and alternative
not to be the drugs people think
channels identified and secured in case of disruption? What
they are buying.
happens if the backup fails?
The American Medical Associationissued a statement advising against
Are there alternative premises and facilities within and outside
stockpiling: "Stockpiling of antivirals,
of an affected region that can be used? Are transport links likely
such as Tamiflu, to have on hand‘just in case' is not recommended
to be sufficient to get people and resources to the alternate sites?
for individuals because of the riskthat symptoms not related to avian
Timing of Corporate Responses
flu will prompt people to initiateunnecessary treatment. In addition,
As stated earlier, the foregoing questions are meant only as a
these drugs are needed to confrontthe real risk of human flu-related
general starting point for companies. The actual timing and severity
illness and deaths that occur annually
of a pandemic, the nature of a particular business or industry, and
in the elderly and other high-risk
other variables will all come into play during an actual incident
and subsequently as the spread of the disease progresses.
"Needlessly taking an antiviral may contribute to the problem of
For example, at what point should a college or university with
resistance to that antiviral drug,which would then make the drug
a large number of students living on campus decide to cancel
less useful in the event of an actual
classes and/or shut down the campus? In that situation, a
avian flu outbreak. Responsible use
balance will need to be struck between acting too soon, which
of antivirals for flu is critical to thehealth of Americans—and the health
could mean canceling school unnecessarily, and acting too late,
of people throughout the world."
which could force students to attempt travel in a time of major
Likewise, a professional services company may have a significantnumber of employees traveling overseas. At what point should itcurtail overseas travel? How much of its resources should it be
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 13
dedicating to increasing its ability to conduct business throughteleconferencing?
A manufacturer may be able to mitigate worker exposure byinstituting mandatory hygiene practices and providing workerswith protective clothing—gloves, masks, hand disinfectants, andso on. At what point should it move to do so? What thresholds
While companies in
would trigger a shift of manufacturing operations to another
many other industries
location and a complete plant shutdown?
will be able to tell their
It is not clear that the H5N1 avian flu will mutate into a human-
workers to work from
to-human disease this season, or ever. However, it is widelybelieved that in the near term the global population will have to
home or take time off,
face a pandemic. It is incumbent on corporate officers to ensure
care providers in most
that their companies have evaluated the risks and implementedthe appropriate steps to mitigate those risks.
instances will not only
be expected to show
up, but also to work
Immense Challenges for the
Health Care System
A pandemic will touch every business sector, but few will be asheavily involved as the health care industry, from the frontlinedoctors, nurses, and others treating patients to the companiesthat will eventually handle a potentially massive number ofinsurance claims. While companies in many other industries willbe able to tell their workers to work from home or take time off,care providers in most instances will not only be expected toshow up, but also to work longer hours.
Yet they will be under the same stresses as others, having familymembers become ill and require care, getting sick themselves,and facing the fear—a heightened fear—of being exposed to thevirus at work.
Numerous government agencies and other industry groups have prepared guidelines for health care facilities and workers to help them prepare for a pandemic. Patient-education material,planning guides for health care facilities, diagnostic-testingguidelines, infection-control guidelines, and more are availablefrom the CDC, the Department of Health and Human Services,and others (see Web sites on page 25)
Pandemic Poses Potential to Stress U.S. Health Care Delivery
Total number infected
Outpatient hospital visits
Estimated economic impact
The number of patients U.S. hospitals and clinics could see duringa pandemic is staggering and should figure into the planning forany health care facility. The CDC's FluSurge software programaims to help hospitals and public health experts estimate thepotential for increased hospital usage during a pandemic. Theprogram estimates the number of hospitalizations and deathsthat would occur during an influenza pandemic and comparesthe number of people hospitalized, the number requiring treat-ment in the intensive care unit (ICU), and the number requiringventilators to a community's existing supplies. Users can plug ina number of variables, including the severity of the virus.
As an example, the CDC used a scenario involving the Atlantametropolitan area during a hypothetical eight-week pandemicwith a 25 percent infection rate. Based on those numbers andavailable information about Atlanta's hospitals, the CDC said thedemand on resources would peak in the pandemic's fifth week,during which an additional:
2,013 people would be hospitalized; 583 of whom would need ICU treatment; and 292 of whom would need ventilators.
For the Atlanta metro area, that represents:
28 percent of hospital beds; 77 percent of ICU capacity; and 42 percent of ventilators.
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 15
Over the eight-week course of such a pandemic, the CDC said,the Atlanta area could expect 13,918 hospital admissions and2,516 deaths. "These sample results from FluSurge illustrate howthe next influenza pandemic may overwhelm existing hospitalresources, given that hospitals increasingly operate at nearly fullcapacity," CDC officials wrote in the FluSurge manual.
As was the case with
The potential stress on the health care system can be expected to
the SARS virus, many
be just as significant in other parts of the United States and theworld—and it could be more severe in areas where health care is
claims stemming from
not as modern or effective. Clearly, health care industry workers
a flu pandemic are likely
need to be prepared to be at ground zero during a pandemic.
to lead to disputes.
Insurance Coverage Questions
In the event of a pandemic, businesses around the world couldsuffer severe economic damage, the extent of which will dependon the severity of the outbreak. Whenever businesses suffer aloss, owners naturally look to their insurance policies for help. Aswas the case with the SARS virus, many claims stemming from aflu pandemic are likely to lead to disputes. Although the outcomeof any claim is dependent on its facts and the legal rules in theapplicable jurisdiction, there are some generalizations that canbe drawn. Experience derived from the SARS outbreak may alsobe instructive.
The following is a brief discussion of pandemic-related issues thatmay arise under several common types of coverage. Understandingthese issues and potential responses may assist in planning and preparation.
The commercial general liability (CGL) policy provides coverageagainst a broad range of liabilities alleged to result from the actsor negligence of the insured. It also provides a defense againstclaims actually or potentially falling within the coverage. Somevariation of this coverage is held by almost all businesses and is,therefore, likely to be at issue in any avian flu-related event.
The standard policy typically responds to bodily injury, sickness,or death allegedly caused by the insured. Insurers are, therefore,
likely to closely scrutinize the alleged causal connection betweena claimed infection or exposure and the actions of the insured.
Because insurers take the position that the policy extends only toactual injuries, they are also likely to look closely at the nature ofinjuries alleged by third parties and may reject claims based onfear of exposure, exposure without actual symptoms, or other
Because of the varied
mental or emotional injuries. However, under the "bodily injury"and/or the "personal injury" language of some policies and the law
wording of CGL policies
of some jurisdictions, such emotional injuries may be covered, so
and the varied legal
careful review is necessary.
interpretations of the
The policy also responds to third-party property damage, butrequires physical injury or destruction of tangible property; so
policy language, cases
insurers may take the position that certain types of claimed
potentially falling within
damage are not covered or that the mere presence of the virus
the reach of the coverages
in or on property does not constitute physical injury.
need to be reported to
The standard policy contains coverage for "personal injury"—anumber of specified wrongs, including wrongful eviction. Policy
the primary and excess
language varies, as does applicable law; but in some situations, it
insurers as soon as there
might be possible to argue that the actions of a landlord or other
is knowledge of a claim.
similar insured that result in closure of a building or evacuationof premises fall within the reach of this definition.
Most liability policies also contain a broadly worded pollutionexclusion, which applies to, among other things, all "solid,liquid or gaseous…contaminants or irritants." Although there are grounds to argue that this language should apply only to industrial chemicals and waste, insurers have used the broadlanguage to deny claims for damage caused by substances ascommon as smoke, grease, and mud. Courts have split on thisargument, with some holding the exclusion applies only toindustrial chemicals and others holding that it must be readbroadly to apply to anything that is potentially an irritant or contaminant. It is, therefore, possible some insurers will arguethat viruses constitute a "contaminant" within the meaning ofthe exclusion and use that as a basis to deny claims.
Because of the varied wording of CGL policies and the varied legal interpretations of the policy language, cases potentiallyfalling within the reach of the coverages need to be reported tothe primary and excess insurers as soon as there is knowledge ofa claim. Umbrella policies are generally broader than the primary
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 17
coverage, so it is important to make sure that the umbrella insur-
International Travel to
er is also on notice for the types of employers liability claims
Avian Flu-Affected Areas
noted in the following section.
During the outbreak of SARS—SevereAcute Respiratory Syndrome—in 2003,
many companies restricted travel to affected areas. It's important for
Workers compensation will undoubtedly be an issue in the event
companies to keep their employees
of an avian flu pandemic. As with any insurance coverage issue,
well-informed about travel restric-tions and precautions, especially
the facts of individual cases will vary, as will the coverage afforded
those who may be traveling to
under various policies according to state and federal laws and the
areas known to harbor avian flu.
terms and conditions of policies that provide coverage beyond that
The Centers for Disease Control
which is mandated by law. Exposure falls into three categories:
and Prevention (CDC) recommendsthe following precautions regarding
potential exposure in the U.S. workplace;
Before travel to areas affected
short-term or temporary assignments outside the United
by avian flu
States and Canada; and
Visit http://www.cdc.gov/travel for
long-term work assignments outside the United States
Check with your doctor or health
care provider to be sure all vacci-
Exposure inside the United States:
Depending on the language
nations are up to date.
in each state's statute relative to occupational disease, workers
Put together a traveler's health
kit, including thermometer and
compensation could be the mechanism to cover medical bills
alcohol-based hand gel.
and reimburse lost wages for avian flu-related disability as
Identify health resources before
long as the exposure meets the jurisdictional compensability
entering the country.
standard. The definition of injury is consistent within the majority
Check your health insurance
of states, requiring it to be "…arising out of and in the course
coverage for medical evacuationcoverage.
During travel in an affected area
Occupational disease is defined more narrowly in some states,
Avoid all direct contact with
which use language such as "hazards in excess of those ordinarily
poultry and handling of surfacesthat have been in contact with
incident to employment in general and/or…peculiar to the occu-
poultry feces or secretions. Avoid
pation in which the employee is engaged." Some states list those
visiting poultry farms or live poultry markets.
occupational diseases that are "covered"; still others considerwhether the risk of exposure is greater on the job than it would
Cleanse hands often with soap
be to the general public.
Ensure all poultry-based foods are
No state specifically references avian flu in its workers compen-
If you become sick with symptoms
sation law. However, claims for disability related to avian flu by
that include fever, cough, sore
employees on work assignments in geographic areas where the
throat, or difficulty breathing, a
risk is identified should file claims under the appropriate policy.
U.S. consular officer can assist youin locating medical services and
If avian flu reaches the United States, the workers compensation
contacting family and friends.
issues will be different from those posed by overseas exposure.
(continued on page 19)
Workers compensation coverage for employees
International Travel to
injured while working temporary assignments outside of the
Avian Flu-Affected Areas
United States will depend on the extraterritorial coverage provi-
(continued from page 18)
sions of the applicable state law. Many states extend benefits tothose injured outside their borders (whether in another state or
After return from an affected
outside the country), provided that the contract of hire was made
Monitor your health for 10 days.
in the state or the principal location of employment is in the state.
If you become ill with a fever,
However, circumstances can arise under which such employees
cough, sore throat, or difficulty
would not be entitled to state workers compensation benefits.
breathing during the 10 days, consult a health care provider. Be
The other coverage that might apply is employers liability, also
sure to alert the provider beforeyour visit that you have been in a
covered under the standard workers compensation policy used
known avian flu area. Also, inform
in most states. But while employers liability coverage applies to
him/her if you have had contact
injuries to employees temporarily outside of the United States or
with poultry during that visit.
Canada—as long as the employer is legally liable for damages as
If ill, limit travel and contact with
others as much as possible.
a result—many employers prefer to address this exposure byarranging for a foreign voluntary compensation benefits endorse-ment or a separate, standalone policy for this coverage. Thisendorsement or policy provides voluntary coverage for the workerscompensation benefits of a given jurisdiction to employees notcovered by state workers compensation law.
Because U.S. nationals assigned to work outside of the UnitedStates for an extended period or indefinitely may not have pro-tection under domestic workers compensation policy, coverageunder a foreign voluntary workers compensation policy orendorsement is generally preferable. The language is usually very similar to that of the National Council on CompensationInsurance (NCCI) voluntary compensation endorsement plus language providing coverage for endemic disease—such as avianflu—and repatriation expense.
An endemic disease is one that is peculiar to a particular country.
The endemic disease coverage language of a foreign voluntaryworkers compensation endorsement establishes that coverageapplies to injury or death arising out of endemic disease even ifthe disease is not covered under the workers compensation oroccupational disease law of the designated state. The repatriationexpense coverage provides for the cost of bringing the employeeor his/her remains back to the United States.
It is important to note, at this juncture, that foreign voluntarycompensation coverage—whether by endorsement or standalone
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 19
policy—is not a standard coverage. There is wide variation in theterms and conditions of coverage from one insurer to the next.
Policy forms and endorsements should be analyzed in detail tobe sure that coverage will apply as expected.
Infection from returning employees:
Exposure within the United
States to employees who may have been infected with avian flu
If an employee alleges a
outside of the United States and Canada presents additional
workplace exposure to
coverage questions. Most state workers compensation statutes donot view illness contracted due to exposure to fellow employees
avian flu, the employer
as a compensable occurrence, as the exposure to illness is not
should report the
usually limited to the workplace. The exposure to avian flu wouldhave to be proven to be solely a result of a workplace exposure
incident to its claims
to be considered for coverage under a standard workers compen-
sation policy in any jurisdiction.
cooperate in any
If an employee alleges a workplace exposure to avian flu, the
employer should report the incident to its claims administratorand cooperate in any investigation. Compensability of each casemust be determined on the merits of the situation and the law ofthe jurisdiction.
Insureds may also have separate coverage for damage arising out of pollution. These policies may provide a basis for seekingcoverage, but it is important to be aware of potential issues andpossible insurer responses.
A typical pollution policy provides coverage for "pollution condi-tions," which must result from a "discharge, dispersal, release,seepage, migration, or escape." The term "pollution condition"is usually defined broadly and includes, as a general category,both "contaminants" and "irritants." However, insurers have often resisted attempts to recover for nonindustrial pollution.
The insurer response to widespread mold claims included revis-ing policy definitions so that they now contain exclusionary or limiting language. Policies now often exclude "naturally occurringsubstances" or "microbial matter." Insurers may argue that thislanguage also applies to viruses. In some policies, the definitionof "microbial matter" is quite broad and may encompass viruses.
In addition to these changes to policy wording, insurers have
argued that the mechanism by which the virus spreads does notconstitute "discharge, dispersal, release, seepage, or migration."
Some insurers have also argued that the broad definition of "pollution" was intended to apply only to industrial pollution andchemicals, rather than to any substance that could be consideredan irritant or contaminant; and in some states, there is case lawthat will support this argument.
Finally, pollution policies often contain a provision requiring thatexpenses be incurred only in response to a government order andthat the order be issued in accordance with a law or regulationgoverning and setting standards for the remediation of the pollu-tant. The likely purpose of this language is to protect the insureragainst voluntary acts or cleanups or governmental overreaching,but it can create difficulties. In the avian flu situation, insurers maytake the position that governmental closure or decontaminationorders are not supported by specific authority, that no standardsexist, that governmental directives are not orders, that the entityissuing the order does not constitute the government, or thatcosts are voluntary. It is, therefore, important to consider theseprovisions when dealing with and responding to local healthauthorities or other governmental or quasi-governmental entities.
Real property may potentially be contaminated in an avian fluoutbreak. The government may close or quarantine a building oran entire neighborhood. Such events could give rise to claimsunder an insured's first-party property coverage.
Insurers begin every analysis of a claim under a property policy,whether for direct damage or time-element loss, by askingwhether insured property (or property of the type insured) hassustained physical loss or damage from an insured event or peril.
Generally, unless the insured's policy provides specific time-element coverages for "infectious disease outbreaks," coverage is unlikely to be triggered. In regard to avian flu, the two mostlikely scenarios resulting in a time-element loss are:
fear that the virus may be present in or near the vicinity where
the insured's property is located, thereby leading to employeeabsences and diminished customer traffic to the site; and
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 21
the actual contamination of the site by the virus, resulting in
Fears That Bird Flu Will
governmental or voluntary closure.
Follow Flaws of Swine Flu
With respect to the first scenario, insurers providing coverage
In the winter of 1976, a small number
under a standard property policy may argue that there is no
of soldiers at Fort Dix developed astrain of the flu that had not been
coverage for losses arising out of people's fear of entering a
seen in humans before. Only one of
premises. Insurers may argue that a mere suspicion that avian
them died, but the incident caught
flu may be present is not sufficient to trigger coverage because
the eye of health officials and trig-gered a national response, one largely
there is no direct physical loss or damage to insured property.
viewed as a failure of overreaction.
In the second scenario, where there is an actual closure because
Epidemiologists found that some ofthe sick soldiers—and the dead
the avian flu has been detected, it may be more difficult to argue
one—were infected with a strain of
there was a lack of physical impact; although insurers may contend
influenza found in pigs. Fearing
that the mere presence of viruses does not constitute physical
that a new strain of flu was about tosweep through the population like
damage. They may also point to the "contamination" exclusion
the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic—and
found in most property policies and the "virus" exclusion found
that it might even be the same strain
within the "mold" exclusions under some more recent forms.
as that killer disease—some called fora national immunization campaign.
The term "contamination" is not defined in most policies. Courtsinterpreting it have reached varying conclusions as to its meaning.
Despite mounting evidence that theswine flu was not a serious threat,
It is likely some insurers would argue it applies to contamination
preparations for a massive vaccina-
by the avian flu virus.
tion program were undertaken. Soonafter the vaccination program began,
The "Civil Authority" extension is commonly
though, critics of the effort emerged.
And so did evidence that the swine
found in business interruption and other time-element forms
flu did not pose the threat of a
where coverage will need to be reviewed relative to this question.
pandemic at all.
Generally, this extension covers the actual business interruption
Nonetheless, more than 40 million
or other time-element loss caused by the action of civil authority
people were vaccinated against the
that prohibits access to the premises covered under the policy,
so-called "swine flu." Any vaccinationcomes with a risk for a small percent-
due to direct physical loss or damage to property other than at
age of those receiving it, and swine
the described premises and arising from a covered cause of loss.
flu vaccinations were no different.
Other restrictions may apply, such as a maximum time period for
The vaccine was believed responsible
recovery, usually three consecutive weeks after a 72-hour waiting
for hundreds of people developing
period. Other forms may limit the scope of coverage to a specified
Guillain-Barre Syndrome, a rare neurological disease characterized
distance from where the damage occurred. In addition, a sublimit
by loss of reflexes and temporary
may be applicable.
paralysis. Hundreds of lawsuits werefiled, resulting in about $100 million
Therefore, in any claim involving this extension, the facts and
in settlements and judgments.
circumstances of the loss and of the governmental action will becritical. Given possible insurer responses, governmental closurebased on suspicion may be treated differently than governmentalclosure that occurs because of the actual presence of the virus. Ineither case, it is likely that insurers will rely on the contaminationexclusion as a basis for denial. Insurers are more than likely to
take an "absolutely no coverage" position if an insured evacuates orcloses voluntarily without an actual order from the civil authorities.
Physical loss or damage:
Insurers may also argue that the presence
of avian flu on the premises does not constitute "physical loss or
damage" under the policy. Insurers may argue that even though it
may be dangerous to enter the premises because of the presence
Insurers may also argue
of avian flu, a property policy insures the structure and/or the
that the presence of avian
property contained therein, not the health of individuals.
flu on the premises does
Some older policy forms and some manuscript forms contain
not constitute "physical
variations in language that could affect these arguments. Examplesinclude forms that contain the words "from any cause whatsoever"
loss or damage" under
in lieu of the more typical "from an insured peril" wording set out
in the civil authority clause. Insurers may insist that such wordingrelates back to the "Perils Insured Against" clause or "Causes of Loss" form, which stipulates "physical loss or damage," andthat it must be read in conjunction with the "Perils Excluded"or "Exclusions" clauses—in other words, contamination.
Similarly, some large hotel/hospitality and entertainment com-panies have obtained programs that contain an endorsementoriginally developed in the London insurance market that coversthe time-element loss resulting from closure of the premises by a public authority after one or more guests exhibit symptoms of a contagious disease. Again, this language is outside the nar-rower scope of the standard "physical loss or damage" verbiage and, therefore, may provide a counterargument to potentialinsurer arguments.
Although it is unlikely any insurer will immediately acknowledgecoverage under a standard property policy for any of the avian fluscenarios discussed above, it is important that all such potentialclaims be reviewed. Where the insured can demonstrate that apublic authority has closed or quarantined its premises as aresult of an actual—provable—contamination by the avian flu,the potential claim should be reported to its property insurers for review.
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 23
The question on the tip of everyone's tongue is, "Just how worriedshould we be about an avian flu pandemic?" The answer is notsimple. Just as residents of San Francisco and Tokyo live with theknowledge they reside in an active earthquake zone, the entireworld is becoming aware that we all live in a potential pandemiczone.
Even if the H5N1 avian flu strain fails to mutate into a form easilytransmissible among humans, it will have raised awareness thatpandemics are a natural part of the world. The issue has nowbecome one that every corporate leader or board of directorsmust consider and take into account.
Coupled with the awareness is the reality that it's impossible topredict ahead of time just how severe an outbreak will be. Beyondfears over the possible loss of life, avian flu has raised concernsabout governments' and businesses' readiness to deal with a crisis of enormous scale. However, there is still time to preparefor the contingency. Now is the time to check your company'spreparedness for handling a pandemic crisis.
Web Sites of Interest
More information on avian flu can be found at the following Websites, most of which provide regular updates:
American Medical Association
http://www.ama-assn.org (see page 13)
Asian Development Bank
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
http://www.cdc.gov (see page 15)
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (links
to individual state avian flu/pandemic response plans)http://www.cste.org
Official U.S. government Web site for avian flu and
pandemic information http://www.pandemicflu.gov
Trust for America's Health
UK Department of Health
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
http://www.un.int (see page 6)
World Health Organization
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 25
Abbreviations and Acronyms
in This Issue
BCM: business-continuity management
CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CGL: comprehensive general liability
ICU: intensive care unit
IT: information technology
NCCI: National Council on Compensation Insurance
SARS: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
WHO: World Health Organizations
Much of the information for this report was provided by:
Dalena L. Berrett, vice president with Marsh's HealthCare
Ronald L. Calhoun, managing director and practice leader
of Marsh's HealthCare Industry Practice;
Paul Clifford, head of China Client Services for Marsh and
Mercer Management Consulting;
Neal Drawas, managing director with Kroll's Environmental
Health and Safety group;
James Edwards, assistant vice president with Marsh's Risk
Consulting Practice, Singapore;
Thomas N. Falzarano, managing director and global practice
leader of Marsh's Liability Claims Practice;
Stephen D. Fraser, managing director with Marsh's Property
Allen M. Gilley, managing director with Marsh's Risk
Harry S. Leff, assistant vice president with Marsh's Risk
Michael Lovdal, managing director with Mercer Management
Gary S. Lynch, managing director and practice leader of
Marsh's Business Continuity Planning Practice;
Paul D. McVey, managing director and global practice leader of
Marsh's Property Claims Practice;
Mark J. Noonan, managing director and North American
practice leader of Marsh's Workers Compensation Practice;
Anne Tiedemann, regional managing director for Europe
and the Middle East with Kroll;
Martin Vilsoe, senior consultant with Marsh's Risk Consulting
Practice, Singapore; and
Robert S. Wilkerson, global practice leader with Kroll's
Corporate Preparedness group.
Volume V, Issue 1, January 2006 27
About Marsh & McLennan Companies
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) is a global professional services firm with annual revenues exceeding $12 billion. It is the parent company of Marsh, the world's leading risk andinsurance services firm; Kroll, the world's leading risk consulting company; Guy Carpenter, theworld's leading risk and reinsurance specialist; Mercer, a major global provider of consultingservices; and Putnam Investments, one of the largest investment management companies in the United States. Approximately 60,000 employees provide analysis, advice, and transactionalcapabilities to clients in over 100 countries. Its stock (ticker symbol: MMC) is listed on the NewYork, Chicago, Pacific, and London stock exchanges.
Marsh meets the global needs of its clients through a wholly owned network of more than 400
offices in more than 100 countries. In every country, Marsh combines a deep knowledge of local
risk issues with the ability to tap global insurance and capital markets for solutions tailored to client
needs. Since its founding more than 130 years ago, Marsh has steadily built its business beyond
insurance broking to encompass a full range of services to identify, value, control, transfer, and
Kroll provides corporate advisory and restructuring, forensic accounting, valuation and litigation
consulting, electronic evidence and data recovery, business intelligence and investigations, back-
ground screening, and security services. It serves a global clientele of law firms, financial institutions,
corporations, nonprofit institutions, government agencies, and individuals.
Guy Carpenter provides reinsurance broking, financial modeling services, and related advisory
functions worldwide for insurers and reinsurers.
Mercer provides clients with solutions linking the three most enduring dimensions of business
success—business design, organizational design, and people strategy. It does this through a unique
array of consulting expertise:
Mercer Human Resource Consulting is the global leader in human-resource, employee-benefit,
and compensation consulting.
Mercer Management Consulting helps clients achieve sustained shareholder value through
innovative business design.
Mercer Oliver Wyman is a leader in financial-services strategy and risk management consulting.
Mercer Delta Consulting works with CEOs and senior teams of major companies on the design
and leadership of large-scale transformation.
NERA Economic Consulting, the leading firm of consulting economists, devises solutions to
problems involving competition, regulation, finance, public policy, and business strategy.
Lippincott Mercer, the premier corporate-identity firm, helps clients create, develop, and manage
their brands throughout the world.
Putnam Investments plays a key role in the financial-planning decisions of millions of individuals and
thousands of institutions. With more than 60 years of investment experience, Putnam provides
investment-management services to more than 2,700 institutional and 401(k) clients and manages
more than 14 million individual-shareholder accounts.
The companies of MMC work together to offer multifaceted client solutions. In so doing, they
bring to bear a unique range of perspectives on the toughest issues confronting clients, industry by
industry. Risk management is the focus for many of these collaborative services. Through the
expertise of Marsh, Kroll, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Putnam, the companies of MMC are uniquely
positioned to offer clients risk solutions and advice across the full range of their strategic, financial,
operating, and hazard risks.
For more information about Marsh & McLennan Companies, go to http://www.mmc.com.
The information contained herein is based on sourceswe believe reliable, but we do not guarantee its accu-racy. It should be understood to be general risk management and insurance information only. Marshmakes no representations or warranties, expressed orimplied, concerning the financial condition, solvency,or application of policy wordings of insurers or rein-surers. The information contained in this publicationprovides only a general overview of subjects covered,is not intended to be taken as advice regarding anyindividual situation, and should not be relied upon assuch. Statements concerning tax and/or legal mattersshould be understood to be general observationsbased solely on our experience as risk consultants andinsurance brokers and should not be relied upon astax and/or legal advice, which we are not authorizedto provide. Insureds should consult their own qualifiedinsurance, tax, and/or legal advisors regarding specificrisk management and insurance coverage issues.
This document or any portion of the information itcontains may not be copied or reproduced in any formwithout the permission of Marsh Inc., except thatclients of any of the Marsh & McLennan Companies,including Marsh, Kroll, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, andPutnam Investments, need not obtain such permissionwhen using this report for their internal purposes.
Marsh is part of the family of MMC companies,including Kroll, Guy Carpenter, Putnam Investments,Mercer HR Consulting (including Mercer HR Services,Mercer Global Investments, Mercer InvestmentConsulting, and Mercer Health & Benefits), and MercerSpecialty Consulting businesses (including MercerOliver Wyman, Mercer Management Consulting,Lippincott Mercer, Mercer Delta, and NERA).
: Avian Flu: Preparing for a Pandemic 2006 Marsh Inc. All rights reserved.
Marsh. The world
's #1 risk specialist.SM
Item #: 100??? 1/06Compliance #: MA5-10579
Guide to yourColonoscopy or Upper GI Endoscopy Pre-Admission Phone Interview Date & Time: (you will be given the time of your procedure on this call) Date of Procedure: _ Your Upcoming Colonoscopy or Upper GI Endoscopy At Grand Itasca, we want to make sure that your endoscopy is as pleasant as possible. This guide is designed to answer any questions
Doing Everything to Conserve Blood Allina Health Hits Benchmarks in a System-wide Effort; Strives for Best in Class Minneapolis Heart Institute AT A GLANCE knew that Pathology could not just mandate new practices Not-for-profit Allina Health serves patients throughout through the system; she needed allies among the providers Minnesota and western Wisconsin at 12 hospitals, 90 clinics